Abstract
The article presents an in-depth theoretical and methodological analysis of the concept of “educational strategy” as an independent didactic category that integrates cognitive, metacognitive, psychological, pedagogical, managerial, and axiological dimensions of the educational process. The current stage of educational development is characterized by a shift from a method-centric to a system-strategic paradigm, in which strategy is viewed not as a set of discrete methods but as a mechanism for forecasting, planning, and achieving educational goals. The strategic approach ensures coherence between aims, content, tools, forms, and learning outcomes, thus creating a basis for holistic quality management in education. The evolution of the category “strategy” is examined in international scholarship, particularly in the works of J. Biggs, M. Fullan, A. Laurillard, R. Oxford, C. Tang, D. Wiley, and B. Zimmerman, who conceptualize strategy as a key mechanism for ensuring the integrity and effectiveness of educational activity. In Ukrainian pedagogical discourse, the concept of strategy has been explored by Aristova, Hryniova, Ievtushenko, Kremen, Kuzmenko, Malykhin, Ostapenko, and Topuzov, who emphasize the importance of strategic thinking, pedagogical forecasting, and quality management in education. Based on strategic, systemic, activity-based, competence-oriented, and other approaches, the article defines the essence of an educational strategy. The authors present three definitions that reflect its multilayered nature: educational strategy as a holistic conceptual model of instructional design; teaching strategy as the teacher’s managerial activity aimed at achieving planned learning outcomes; and learning strategy in higher education as a conscious system of actions performed by the learner. It is demonstrated that introducing the concept of “strategy” into the modern didactic category system helps overcome methodological fragmentation and forms a basis for innovative models of instruction oriented toward strategic thinking, self-regulation, learner agency, and partnership between teachers and learners. The strategic approach is identified as a prerequisite for ensuring sustainability, flexibility, and adaptability of education in the context of digitalization, global mobility, and European integration processes in Ukraine. Prospects for further research include developing a typology of educational strategies,
designing models of strategic management in educational processes, and integrating the strategic approach into digital, blended, and inclusive education aligned with the principles of sustainable development and academic integrity.
References
Бондарчук, Ю. (2025). Аналіз стратегій мотиваційних змін у здобувачів першого (бакалаврського) рівня освіти при вивченні англійської мови. Український педагогічний журнал, (1), 130–139. https://doi.org/10.32405/2411-1317-2025-1-130-139
Кремень, В., Топузов, О., Ляшенко, О., Мальований, Ю. & Засєкіна, Т. (2023). Профільна середня освіта: концептуальні засади для нової української школи (стратегічний вимір). Вісник НАПН України, 5(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.37472/v.naes.2023.5201
Зінченко, В., Базелюк, Н., Бойченко, М., Горбунова, Л., Курбатов, С., Мєлков, Ю., & Шипко, О. (2020). Стратегії вищої освіти в умовах інтернаціоналізації для стійкого розвитку суспільства: монографія. Київ: Інститут вищої освіти НАПН України. https://doi.org/10.31874/978-617-7486-36-6-2020
Кабінет Міністрів України. (2022). Стратегія розвитку вищої освіти в Україні на 2022–2032 роки (Розпорядження № 286-р). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/286-2022-%D1%80#Text
Топузов, О. М., Малихін, О. В., Арістова, Н. О., Алєксєєва, С. В., Попов, Р. А., Барановська, О. В., & Шелестова, Л. В. (2024) Теорія і практика індивідуалізації навчання в умовах змішаної форми організації освітнього процесу в закладах загальної середньої освіти: монографія. Київ: Освіта. https://doi.org/10.32405/978-966-983-485-0-2024-1099
Топузов, О. & Малихін, О. (2023). Стратегічні засади модернізації змісту шкільної освіти в умовах реформування НУШ. У Світ дидактики: дидактика в сучасному світі (с. 155–163).
Штучний інтелект у вищій освіті: ризики та перспективи інтеграції: матеріали всеукраїнського науково-педагогічного підвищення кваліфікації, 1 липня – 11 серпня 2024 року. (2024). Львів: Торунь: Liha-Pres.. https://cuesc.org.ua/images/informlist/%D0%9C%D0%B0%D0%BA%D0%B5%D1%82%20advanced_training_OLA.pdf
Biggs, J. (2003). Teaching for Quality Learning at University (2nd Ed.). Maidenhead: Open University Press: Society for Research into Higher Education
Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2022). Teaching for Quality Learning at University (5th Ed.). Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Bondarchuk, J., Khomenko, O., Vasylenko, O., & Yanchuk, O. (2024). Innovative strategies for learning English during wartime in Ukraine: Focusing on students’ motivation and preferences. Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 16 (4), 378‒399. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/16.4/920
Dochy, F., Collins, M., Gijbels, D., & Van Gerven, P. (2022). The effectiveness of self-regulated learning (SRL) interventions on language learning achievement and strategy employment: A meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, (13). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1021101
Ellis, R. (2022). Strategic directions in the what and how of learning and teaching innovation. Higher Education, (84), 1263–1279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00945-2
European Commission. (2024). Education and Training Monitor 2024. Youth, Sport and Culture. https://www. cedefop.europa.eu/files/education_and_training_monitor_2024.pdf
European University Association (EUA). (2023). The Future of Digitally Enhanced Learning and Teaching in European Higher Education Institutions. Brussels: EUA. https://eua.eu/resources/publications/1032:thefuture-of-digitally-enhanced-learning-and-teaching.html
Fullan, M. (2014). The Principal: Three Keys to Maximizing Impact. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Fullan, M. (2023). The Principal 2.0. Three Keys to Maximizing Impact (2nd Ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. https://books.google.com.ua/books?id=BjmqEAAAQBAJ&printsec=copyright&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
Gaebel, M. & Morrisroe, A. (2023). The future of digitally enhanced learning and teaching in european higher education institutions. European University Association absl. https://www.eua.eu/images/pdf/digi-he_final_report.pdf?utm
Galdames-Calderón, M., Latorre-Catalán, J., & Araya-Cortés, E. (2024). Systematic review: Revisiting challenge-based learning teaching practices in higher education. Education Sciences, 14(9), 1008. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14091008
Gudonienė, D. (2025). Hybrid teaching and learning in higher education: A systematic review. Sustainability, 17(2), 756. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17020756
Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause Review, 27(1), 1–12. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online learning
Laurillard, D. (2012). Teaching as a Design Science: Building Pedagogical Patterns for Learning and Technology (2nd Ed.). London: Routledge. https://api.pageplace.de/preview/DT0400.9781136448201_A23846913/preview-9781136448201_A23846913.pdf
OECD. (2021). Education at a Glance 2023: OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/69096873-en
Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language Learning Strategies: What Every Teacher Should Know. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
Oxford, R. L. (2011). Teaching and Researching Language Learning Strategies. Harlow, England: Pearson Education.
Oxford, R. L. (2020). Teaching and Researching Language Learning Strategies: Self-Regulation in Context (3rd Ed.). New York: Routledge. https://api.pageplace.de/preview/DT0400.9781317878001_A23914300/preview-9781317878001_A23914300.pdf
Ramsden, P. (2003). Learning to Teach in Higher Education (2nd Ed.). London: New York: Routledge Falmer. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203507711
Wenden, A., & Rubin, J. (Eds.). (1987). Learner Strategies in Language Learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Yu, B. (2022). Self-regulated learning: A key factor in the effectiveness of online learning for second language learners. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1051349
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2
Biggs, J. (2003). Teaching for Quality Learning at University (2nd Ed.). Maidenhead: Open University Press: Society for Research into Higher Education (in English).
Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2022). Teaching for Quality Learning at University (5th Ed.). Maidenhead: Open University Press (in English).
Bondarchuk, J., Khomenko, O., Vasylenko, O., & Yanchuk, O. (2024). Innovative strategies for learning English during wartime in Ukraine: Focusing on students’ motivation and preferences. Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 16(4), 378–399. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/16.4/920 (in English).
Bondarchuk, Yu. (2025). Analiz stratehii motyvatsiinykh zmin u zdobuvachiv pershoho ( bakalavrskoho) rivnia osvity pry vyvchenni anhliiskoi movy [ Analysis of motivational change strategies among firstyear bachelor students learning English]. Ukrainskyi Pedahohichnyi Zhurnal, (1), 130–139. https://doi.org/10.32405/2411-1317-2025-1-130-139 (in Ukrainian).
Cabinet Ministers of Ukraine. (2022). Stratehiia rozvytku vyshchoi osvity v Ukraini na 2022–2032 roky [Strategy for the Development of Higher Education in Ukraine for 2022–2032] (Decree No. 286-r). https://mon.gov.ua/osvita-2/vishcha-osvita-ta-osvita-doroslikh/strategiya-rozvitku-vishchoi-osviti-v-ukraini-na-2022-2032-roki (in Ukrainian).
Dochy, F., Collins, M., Gijbels, D., & Van Gerven, P. (2022). The effectiveness of self-regulated learning (SRL) interventions on language learning achievement and strategy employment: A meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, (13). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1021101 (in English).
Ellis, R. (2022). Strategic directions in the what and how of learning and teaching innovation. Higher Education, (84), 1263–1279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00945-2 (in English).
European Commission. (2024). Education and Training Monitor 2024. Youth, Sport and Culture. https://education. ec.europa.eu (in English).
European University Association (EUA). (2023). The Future of Digitally Enhanced Learning and Teaching in European Higher Education Institutions. Brussels: EUA. https://eua.eu/resources/publications/1032:thefuture-of-digitally-enhanced-learning-and-teaching.html (in English).
Fullan, M. (2014). The Principal: Three Keys to Maximizing Impact. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass (in English).
Fullan, M. (2023). The Principal 2.0: Three Keys to Maximizing Impact (2nd Ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. https://books.google.com.ua/books?id=BjmqEAAAQBAJ (in English).
Gaebel, M., & Morrisroe, A. (2023). The Future of Digitally Enhanced Learning and Teaching in European Higher Education Institutions. European University Association. https://www.eua.eu/images/pdf/digi-he_final_report.pdf (in English).
Galdames-Calderón, M., Latorre-Catalán, J., & Araya-Cortés, E. (2024). Systematic review: Revisiting challenge-based learning teaching practices in higher education. Education Sciences, 14(9), 1008. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14091008 (in English).
Gudonienė, D. (2025). Hybrid teaching and learning in higher education: A systematic review. Sustainability, 17(2), 756. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17020756 (in English).
Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause Review, 27(1), 1–12. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning (in English).
Kremen, V., Topuzov, O., Liashenko, O., Malovanyi, Yu., & Zasiekina, T. (2023). Profilna serednia osvita: kontseptualni zasady dlia novoi ukrainskoi shkoly (stratehichnyi vymir) [Profile secondary education: Conceptual foundations for the New Ukrainian School (strategic dimension)]. Visnyk NAPN Ukrainy, 5(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.37472/v.naes.2023.5201 (in Ukrainian).
Laurillard, D. (2012). Teaching as a Design Science: Building Pedagogical Patterns for Learning and Technology (2nd Ed.). London: Routledge. https://api.pageplace.de/preview/DT0400.9781136448201_A23846913/preview-9781136448201_A23846913.pdf (in English).
Liha-Pres. (2024). Shtuchnyi intelekt u vyshchii osviti: ryzyky ta perspektyvy intehratsii [Artificial intelligence in higher education: Risks and prospects of integration]. Lviv: Torun: Liha-Pres. https://cuesc.org.ua/images/informlist/Мaket_advanced_training_OLA.pdf (in Ukrainian).
OECD. (2023). Education at a Glance 2023: OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/69096873-en (in English).
Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language Learning Strategies: What Every Teacher Should Know. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle (in English).
Oxford, R. L. (2011). Teaching and Researching Language Learning Strategies. Harlow, England: Pearson Education (in English).
Oxford, R. L. (2020). Teaching and Researching Language Learning Strategies: Self-Regulation in Context (3rd Ed.). New York: Routledge. https://api.pageplace.de/preview/DT0400.9781317878001_A23914300/preview-9781317878001_A23914300.pdf (in English).
Ramsden, P. (2003). Learning to Teach in Higher Education (2nd ed.). London: New York: Routledge Falmer. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203507711 (in English).
Topuzov, O. M., Malykhin, O. V., Aristova, N. O., Aleksieieva, S. V., Popov, R. A., Baranovska, O. V., & Shelestova, L. V. (2024). Teoriia i praktyka indyvidualizatsii navchannia v umovakh zmistshenoi formy osvitnoho protsesu v zakladakh zahalnoi serednoi osvity [Theory and practice of individualization of learning under blended formats in secondary education]. Kyiv: Osvita. https://doi.org/10.32405/978-966-983-485-0-2024-1099 (in Ukrainian).
Topuzov, O., & Malykhin, O. (2023). Stratehichni zasady modernizatsii zmistu shkilnoi osvity v umovakh reformuvannia NUSh [Strategic principles for modernizing school education content under the New Ukrainian School reform]. In Svit dydaktyky: Dydaktyka v suchasnomu sviti (pp. 155–163). Kyiv (in Ukrainian).
Wenden, A., & Rubin, J. (Eds.). (1987). Learner Strategies in Language Learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall (in English).
Yu, B. (2022). Self-regulated learning: A key factor in the effectiveness of online learning for second language learners. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1051349 (in English).
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2
Zinchenko, V., Bazeliuk, N., Boichenko, M., Horbunova, L., Kurbatov, S., Mielkov, Y., & Shypko, O. (Eds.). (2020). Stratehii vyshchoi osvity v umovakh internatsionalizatsii dlia stiikoho rozvytku suspilstva [Higher education strategies in the context of internationalization for sustainable development of society]. Kyiv: Instytut vyshchoi osvity NAPN Ukrainy. https://ihed.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Strategiy_VO_v_umovah_internac_IVO-2020-199p_avtors-kolektiv.pdf (in Ukrainian).

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

