Comparative Analysis of Traditional, Distant and Blended Learning of the English Language at Universities
PDF (Українська)
HTML (Українська)

Keywords

foreign language teaching
mixed method
traditional method
distance method
student survey

How to Cite

Podoliak М. (2023). Comparative Analysis of Traditional, Distant and Blended Learning of the English Language at Universities. Ukrainian Educational Journal, (4), 87–97. https://doi.org/10.32405/2411-1317-2022-4-87-97

Abstract

The events of recent years in Ukraine and the world have contributed to the development of new educational trends and teaching methods. Those teaching methods that were voluntary until 2020, with the pandemic and the Russian-Ukrainian war, became mandatory. We are talking about distance and blended learning. This article is a continuation and logical addition to the experimental study of the effectiveness of foreign language teaching in freelance education, using traditional, distance, and mixed teaching methods. The results of the experiments showed that the most effective method of teaching a foreign language was a mixed method. This method has absorbed all the advantages of traditional and remote methods, eliminating the disadvantages of each. Our article aims to analyze students' responses to distance, traditional and mixed methods of teaching a professional foreign language. The task of our study was to investigate students' responses to each of these teaching methods and determine their possible future choice of one of these methods. For this purpose, we selected students and formed three groups. Each group was studied according to the chosen methodology (traditional, mixed, and distance). The experiment lasted for one semester or 16 weeks. After the experiment, the students were interviewed, and they stated that they were generally satisfied with the distance and blended learning methods. In addition, according to the results of the surveys, students of the traditional form of education would mostly choose a mixed method of teaching a foreign language in the Free Economic Zone. Among the advantages of this teaching method, the subjects noted convenient time and place of study; frequent repetition of materials; exciting and interactive learning materials. Compared to distance learning, blended has several advantages, in particular: interaction with the teacher and between students; better development of oral speech in students. The benefits of blended learning to traditional noted by students were: the convenience of learning (time and place of the student's choice); more frequent repetition of materials. Therefore, a hypothetical choice of students between the three teaching methods would be a mixed method of teaching a foreign language.

https://doi.org/10.32405/2411-1317-2022-4-87-97
PDF (Українська)
HTML (Українська)

References

Alammary, A., Carbone, A. & Sheard, J. (2016). Blended learning in higher education: Delivery methods selection. Research Papers, 150, https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2016_rp/150

Allen, M., Bourhis, J., Burrel, N., Marby, E. (2002). Comparing student satisfaction with distance education to traditional classrooms in higher education: a meta-analysis. The American journal of distance education, 16(2), 83‒97.

Atmojo, A. E. P. & Nugroho, A. (2020). EFL classes must go online! Teaching activities and challenges during COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia. Register Journal, 13(1), 49‒76. https://doi.org/10.18326/rgt. v13i1.49-76

Ariza, E., Hancock, S. (2003). Second language acquisition theories as a framework for creating distance learning courses. International review of research in open and distance learning, 4 (2).

Basal, A. (2015). The implementation of a flipped classroom in foreign language teaching. Turkish online journal of distance education, 16(4), 28‒37.

Castro, R. (2019). Blended learning in higher education: Trends and capabilities. Education and Information Technologies, 24, 2523–2546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09886-3

Caner, M. (2010). A blended learning model for teaching practice course. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 11(3), 79‒97. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/tojde/issue/16909/176358

Cleveland-Innes, M., & Wilton, D. (2018). Guide to blended learning. Burnaby: Commonwealth of Learning.

Ekmerci, E. (2014). Distance-education in foreign language teaching: evaluations from the perspectives of freshman students. Procedia – Social and behavioral sciences, 176, 390‒397.

Er, S., Aksu Ataç, B. (2014). Cooperative learning in ELT classes: The attitudes of students towards cooperative learning in ELT classes. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching (IOJET), 2(1), 109‒122.

Glenn, A. (2001). A comparison of distance learning and traditional learning environment. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED457778.pdf

Graham, C. R. (2017). Thematic patterns in international blended learning literature, research, practices, and terminology. Online Learning, 21(4), 337–361. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v21i4.998.

Graham, C. R., Woodfield, W., Harrison, J. B. (2013). A framework for institutional adoption and implementation of blended learning in higher education. The Internet and higher education, 18, 4‒14.

Hall, D., Knox, J. (2009). Language teacher education by distance. The Cambridge guide to second language teacher education, 218‒229.

Hannay, M., Newvine, T. (2006). Perceptions of distance learning: a comparison of online and traditional learning. MERLOT Journal of online learning and teaching, 2(1), 1‒11.

Kemaloglu Er, E. & Bayyurt, Y. (2022). Implementation of blended learning in English as a Lingua Franca (EFL)-aware pre-service teacher education. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 23 (1), 60‒73 . DOI: 10.17718/tojde.1050353

Kim, A. (2014). Rotational model work for any classroom. https://www.edelements.com/rotational-models-work-for-any-classroom

Koksal, D. (2004). Assessing teachers' testing skills in ELT and enhancing their professional development through distance learning on the net. Turkish online journal of distance education, 5(1).

Kurniawati, A.D., Noviani, J. (2021) Indonesian Students’ Perception about the Effectiveness of E-Learning Implementation during COVID-19. The New Educational Review, 66(4), 95‒107 https://tner.polsl.pl/e66/a8.pdf

Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., Jones, K. (2010). Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies. US Department of Education. https://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/tech/evidence-based-practices/finalreport.pdf

Octaberlina, L., Muslimin, A. (2020). EFL Students Perspective towards Online Learning Barriers and Alternatives Using Moodle/Google Classroom during COVID-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Higher Education, Vol. 9, No. 6, https://www.sciedu.ca/journal/index.php/ijhe/article/view/18485/11472

Padede, P. (2012). Blended learning for ELT. Journal of English teaching, 2(3), pp. 165‒171.

Pitula, B., Grzyb, B. (2021) Adaptation of Students to Educational Changes Caused by the COVID-19 Pandemic. The New Educational Review, 66(4), 47‒56 https://tner.polsl.pl/e66/a4.pdf

Podoliak, M. (2022) The Comparative analysis of Face-to-Face, Distant and Blended learning in English language teaching. Register Journal, 15(1), 62‒43 https://dx.doi.org/10.18326/rgt.v15i1.42-63

Sachar, M., Neumann, Y. (2010). Twenty years of research on the academic performance differences between traditional and distance learning: summative meta-analysis and trend examination. MERLOT Journal of online learning and teaching, 6(2), 318‒334.

Sakar, N. (2009). Online course support in distance learning: student evaluation of English language teaching Bachelor of Arts program. Turkish online journal of distance education, 10(2), 86‒100.

Sampson, N. (2003). Meeting the needs of distance learners. Language learning and technology, 7(3), 103‒118.

Scarlett, M. H. (2017). Blended learning in teacher education: A case study from a small, private college. https://conference.iste.org/uploads/ISTE2017/HANDOUTS/KEY_108226560/BlendedLearningin TeacherEducation_ResearchPaper_ISTE2017.pdf

Thompson, B., Whittacker, C. (2019). Blended learning in English language teaching: Course design and implementation. British Council, 259.

Trajanovic, M., Domazet, D.S., Misic-Ilic, B. (2007). Distance learning and foreign language teaching. https://telearn.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00190064/document

Yilmaz, O. & Malone, K. L. (2020). Preservice teachers’ perceptions about the use of blended learning in a science education methods course. Smart Learning Environments, 7(18). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-020-00126-7

White, C. (2006). Distance learning of foreign languages. Language Teaching, 39(4), 247‒264.

White, C. (2008). Language learning strategies in independent language learning: an overview. Language learning strategies in independent settings, Clevedon, England: Multilingual matters, 3‒24.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2023 Михайло Подоляк

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.