INTEGRATION PROCESSES IN EUROPEAN UNION SECONDARY EDUCATION: PROGRESS IN ACHIEVING THE INDICATORS OF THE EUROPEAN EDUCATION AREA
PDF (Українська)
HTML (Українська)

Keywords

integration processes
secondary education
European Union (EU)
European Education Area (EEA)
European integration

How to Cite

Voronina-Pryhodii Д. (2024). INTEGRATION PROCESSES IN EUROPEAN UNION SECONDARY EDUCATION: PROGRESS IN ACHIEVING THE INDICATORS OF THE EUROPEAN EDUCATION AREA. Ukrainian Educational Journal, (4), 41–56. https://doi.org/10.32405/2411-1317-2024-4-41-56

Abstract

The relevance of the study is determined by the New Ukrainian School reform, which lays the groundwork for the integration of Ukraine's secondary education into the European Education Area. The purpose of the article is to analyze the key aspects of integration processes in secondary education in the EU Member States in the context of the European Education Area development, which is proclaimed as the goal of European cooperation in the field of education and training by 2030. To achieve this goal, the following groups of sources were analyzed: EU documents that define the European policy in the field of secondary education and the directions of its development until 2030; legislative and regulatory documents of Ukraine that form the legal basis for reforming the Ukrainian education system, its modernization, quality and accessibility in accordance with EU requirements; works of foreign researchers on the integration of education and training, which outline key challenges and prospects within the framework of European integration processes in education; works by Ukrainian comparativists analyzing the processes of European integration in, harmonization of educational standards with European ones, etc. For this study, the method of comparative analysis was used to compare the state of secondary education and its compliance with the requirements of the European Education Area in different EU countries, and the results of the analysis of general trends and prospects for further integration of the educational systems of the EU Member States in the context of the single European Education Area formation and Ukraine's consideration of promising benchmarks and practices were summarized on the basis of synthesis. It is revealed that integration processes at the secondary education level are a component of integration processes at other educational levels. The purpose of such integration is to build the European Education Area, as defined in the current Strategy for European Cooperation in Education and Training for the period 2021-2030. The article characterizes the factors that led to the integration processes in EU secondary education (political, economic, socio-cultural, technological/digital integration of member states). It is concluded that integration processes in education focus on harmonizing standards to improve the quality and accessibility of education. An open method of coordination and the use of data for benchmarking are key tools to achieve these goals. At the same time, European integration of education involves balancing the EU's policy guidelines with the national priorities of each member state, which is an important signal for Ukraine. The current European Cooperation Program for Education and Training until 2030 aims to create a European Education Area, which is designed to promote the quality of education and equal opportunities in education in the EU member states. The key benchmarks for integration processes in secondary education in the European Cooperation in Education and Training Program until 2030 include: enrollment of children in preschool education to prepare them for school; secondary education for young people; reading, mathematical and natural science literacy for 15-year-olds; and computer and information literacy for eighth-graders. If Ukraine takes into account these guidelines, it will contribute to the successful implementation of the New Ukrainian School reform and strengthen the European identity of young Ukrainians. This will ensure the integration of national education into the European Education Area at the level of other member states.

https://doi.org/10.32405/2411-1317-2024-4-41-56
PDF (Українська)
HTML (Українська)

References

Закон України «Про освіту». (2017). Закон України № 2145-VIII. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2145-19#Text

Кабінет Міністрів України (КМУ). (2016, 14 грудня). Концепція реалізації державної політики у сфері реформування загальної середньої освіти «Нова українська школа» на період до 2029 року: Розпорядження № 988-р. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/988-2016-%D1%80#Text

Кондратюк, В. В. (2007). Інтеграційні процеси: поняття, підходи, закордонний досвід. Збірник наукових праць КНТУ. Економічні науки, 4, 215–219. https://dspace.kntu.kr.ua/server/api/core/bitstreams/4cd655ef-8023-47b8-894d-3d2f34564c0e/content

Локшина, О. (2019). Європейська довідкова рамка ключових компетентностей для навчання впродовж життя: оновлене бачення 2018 року. Український Педагогічний журнал, 3, 21–30. https://doi.org/10.32405/2411-1317-2019-3-21-30

Локшина, О. (2024a). Європейський освітній простір як інтеграційна перспектива української освіти. Український Педагогічний журнал, 2, 6–19. https://doi.org/10.32405/2411-1317-2024-2-6-19

Локшина, О. І. (2024b). Актуальність наукових досліджень українських компаративістів в умовах європейської інтеграції національної освіти. В Цифрова компетентність вчителя нової української школи 2024: інновації в умовах змін: препринт (с. 72–73). ІЦО НАПН України. https://lib.iitta.gov.ua/id/eprint/741127

Локшина, О. І. (ред.), Джурило, А. П., Глушко, О. З., Кравченко, C. М., Нікольська, Н. В., Тименко, М. М., & Шпарик, О. М. (2021). Тенденції розвитку шкільної освіти в країнах ЄС, США та Китаї: монографія. КОНВІ ПРІНТ. https://doi.org/10.32405/978-617-8124-17-5-2021-350

Міністерство освіти і науки України (МОН України). (2016, 27 жовтня). Нова українська школа. Концептуальні засади реформування середньої школи. https://mon.gov.ua/static-objects/mon/sites/1/zagalna%20serednya/nova-ukrainska-shkola-compressed.pdf

Радкевич, В. О. (ред.), Попова, В. В., Джурило, А. П., & Вороніна-Пригодій, Д. А. (2023). Зарубіжний досвід розвитку публічно-приватного партнерства у сфері професійної освіти і навчання: практичний посібник. Київ: Інститут професійної освіти НАПН України. https://lib.iitta.gov.ua/id/eprint/739931

Сбруєва, А. А. (2021). Порівняльна педагогіка вищої школи: національний, європейський та глобальний контексти: навчальний посібник. СумДПУ імені А. С. Макаренка. https://jmm.sspu.edu.ua/images/2021/kursi_vse/CompHEd_course/Comparative_Higher_Education_Handbook_2021n_49126.pdf

Сисоєва, С. (2014). Порівняльна педагогіка в контексті розвитку освітології. Освітологія, 3, 17-23. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/ocvit_2014_3_4

Топузов, О., Локшина, О., Джурило, А., & Шпарик, О. (2023). Європейський дослідницький простір як орієнтир розвитку освіти і науки в Україні. Український Педагогічний журнал, 4, 5–19. https://doi.org/10.32405/2411-1317-2023-4-5-19

Шпарик, О. (2024). Інтеграція шкільних систем у Європейському Союзі: сучасні тенденції. Український Педагогічний журнал, 3, 41–51. https://doi.org/10.32405/2411-1317-2024-3-41-51

Akin, S. (2019). European union’s integrated educational policy background and involved political institutions. IKSAD Publishing House. https://iksadyayinevi.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/EUROPEAN-UNION’S-INTEGRATED-EDUCATIONAL-POLICY-BACKGROUND-AND-INVOLVED-POLITICAL.pdf

Alexiadou, N. (2014). Policy learning and europeanisation in education: The governance of a field and the transfer of knowledge. In A. Nordin & D. Sundberg (eds.) Transnational Policy Flows in European Education: the making and governing of knowledge in the education policy field (p. 123–140). Symposium Books. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/264717959

Alexiadou, N., & Rambla, X. (2023). Education policy governance and the power of ideas in constructing the new European Education Area. European Educational Research Journal, 22(6), 852–869. https://doi.org/10.1177/14749041221121388

Brine, J. (2006). Lifelong learning and the knowledge economy: Those that know and those that do not – the discourse of the European Union. Journal: British Educational Research Journal, 32(5), 649–665. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920600895676

Cino Pagliarello, M. (2020a). Aligning policy ideas and power: the roots of the competitiveness frame in European education policy. Comparative Education, 56(4), 441–458. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2020.1769927

Cino Pagliarello, M. (2020b). Integration theories and European education policy: bringing the role of ideas back in. Journal of Contemporary European Research, 16(3), 320–338. https://doi.org/10.30950/jcer.v16i3.1088

Corbett, A. (2005). Universities and the Europe of Knowledge: Ideas, Institutions, and Policy Entrepreneurship in European Union Higher Education Policy, 1955-2005. Palgrave Macmillan. https://books.google.com.ua/books/about/Universities_and_the_Europe_of_Knowledge.html?id=lmSHDAAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y

Council of the European Union. (2006). Recommendation of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 on key competences for lifelong learning. Official Journal of the European Union, L 394, 10–18. CELEX. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32006H0962

Council of the European Union. (2018). Council recommendation of 22 May 2018 on key competences for lifelong learning (Text with EEA relevance). Official Journal of the European Union, С 189, 1–13. CELEX. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32018H0604(01)

Council of the European Union. (2021). Council Resolution on a strategic framework for European cooperation in education and training towards the European Education Area and beyond (2021-2030) 2021/C 66/01. Official Journal of the European Union, C 66, 1–21. CELEX. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32021G0226(01)

European Commission. (2008). A Rewarding Challenge: How Language diversity Could Strengthen Europe (Proposals from the Group of Intellectuals for Intercultural Dialogue). European Commission. https://www.språkförsvaret.se/sf/fileadmin/PDF/Rewarding_challenge.pdf

European Commission. (2020). Communication from the commission to the European parliament, the council, the European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions. Digital Education Action Plan 2021-2027. Resetting education and training for the digital age. European Commission. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52020DC0624

European Commission. (2022). Communication from the commission to the European parliament, the European council and the council. Commission Opinion on Ukraine’s application for membership of the European Union. European Commission. https://neighbourhood-enlargement.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2022-06/Ukraine%20Opinion%20and%20Annex.pdf

European Commission. (2023a). Education and Training Monitor 2023: comparative report. Publications Office of the European Union. https://ec.europa.eu/education/monitor

European Commission. (2023b). Education and Training Monitor Toolbox 2023. Publications Office of the European Union. https://op.europa.eu/webpub/eac/education-and-training-monitor-2023/en/monitor-toolbox/themes/teaching-profession/attractiveness-teaching-profession.html

European Commission. (n. d.). European Education Area: Quality education and training for all. https://education.ec.europa.eu/about-eea/strategic-framework

European Union. (n. d.). Erasmus+ Virtual Exchange. https://youth.europa.eu/erasmusvirtual_en

Gaušas S., Daminov, I., Jašinskaitė, E., Čop, D., Mileiko, I., Gudauskaitė, G., Leaton Gray, S., Pukallus, S., & Bulwer J. (2022). The European Schools system: State of Play, Challenges and Perspectives. European Union. https://www.eursc.eu/Documents/EP%20PE699_647_European_Schools_System_study.pdf

Huisman J., Adelman, C., Hsieh, C.C., Shams, F., & Wilkins, S. (2012). Europe’s Bologna process and its impact on global higher education. In D. K. Deardorff, H. de Wit, J. D. Heyl, and T. Adams (eds.) The SAGE Handbook of International Higher Education (p. 81-100). Sage Publications. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452218397

Kovács, T., Bittner, B., & Nabradi, A. (2022). The Integration of Digital Technologies in the European Union based on the DESI Index. ENTRENOVA – ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion, 8(1), 337–349. http://dx.doi.org/10.54820/entrenova-2022-0029

Lawn, M., & Grek, S. (2012). Europeanizing Education: Governing a New Policy Space. Symposium Books. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED530747

Lokshyna, O. I., Dzhurylo, A. P., Glushko, O. Z., & Shparyk, O. M. (2021). Secondary education reform priorities under globalisation: the case of Ukraine in comparison with China, Germany and Poland. SHS Web of Conferences, 104, 01004. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202110401004

OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Results (Volume II): Where All Students Can Succeed. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/b5fd1b8f-en

OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 results: Factsheets. Ukrainian regions (18 of 27). OECD. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2023/11/pisa-2022-results-volume-i-and-ii-country-notes_2fca04b9/ukrainian-regions-18-of-27_de3ad3b1/78043794-en.pdf

Phillips, D., & Ertl, H. (eds.). (2003). Implementing European Union education and training policy: A comparative study of issues in four member states. Kluwer Academic Publishers. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48077-8

Prpic, M. (2014). The Open Method of Coordination. European Parliament Research Service. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/EPRS/EPRS-AaG-542142-Open-Method-of-Coordination-FINAL.pdf

Shaw, J. (2022). European Integration. A. Introduction: Integration Through Law. The Oxford Encylopedia of EU Law [OEEUL]. https://opil.ouplaw.com/display/10.1093/law-oeeul/law-oeeul-e102

St. John, S. K. (2020). Education and Solidarity in the European Union: Europe’s Lost Spirit. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63042-3

Steinberg, F. (2023). The Next Steps in EU Economic Integration. Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS). https://www.csis.org/analysis/next-steps-eu-economic-integration

Ultan Sönmez, M. O. (2016). The effect of cultural factors on the European integration. In IISES – 23rd International Academic Conference (p. 442–456), Venice. http://dx.doi.org/10.20472/IAC.2016.023.091

Vaubel, R. (2004). European Political Integration. In Rowley, C. K., Schneider, F. (eds.) The Encyclopedia of Public Choice (p. 554-556). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-306-47828-4_97

Ziegele, F., & Mordhorst, L. (2019). Competition, Collaboration and Complementarity: Higher Education Policies in Europe. In R. M. O. Pritchard, M. O’Hara, C. Milsom, J. Williams, L. Matei (eds.) The Three Cs of Higher Education: Competition, Collaboration and Complementarity (p. 11–26). Central European University Press. https://dokumen.pub/the-three-cs-of-higher-education-competition-collaboration-and-complementarity-9789633863282.html

Akin, S. (2019). European union’s integrated educational policy background and involved political institutions. IKSAD Publishing House. https://iksadyayinevi.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/EUROPEAN-UNION’S-INTEGRATED-EDUCATIONAL-POLICY-BACKGROUND-AND-INVOLVED-POLITICAL.pdf, [in English].

Alexiadou, N. (2014). Policy learning and europeanisation in education: The governance of a field and the transfer of knowledge. In A. Nordin & D. Sundberg (eds.) Transnational Policy Flows in European Education: the making and governing of knowledge in the education policy field (p. 123–140). Symposium Books. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/264717959, [in English].

Alexiadou, N., & Rambla, X. (2023). Education policy governance and the power of ideas in constructing the new European Education Area. European Educational Research Journal, 22(6), 852–869. https://doi.org/10.1177/14749041221121388, [in English].

Brine, J. (2006). Lifelong learning and the knowledge economy: Those that know and those that do not – the discourse of the European Union. Journal: British Educational Research Journal, 32(5), 649–665. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920600895676, [in English].

Cino Pagliarello, M. (2020a). Aligning policy ideas and power: the roots of the competitiveness frame in European education policy. Comparative Education, 56(4), 441–458. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2020.1769927, [in English].

Cino Pagliarello, M. (2020b). Integration theories and European education policy: bringing the role of ideas back in. Journal of Contemporary European Research, 16(3), 320–338. https://doi.org/10.30950/jcer.v16i3.1088, [in English].

Corbett, A. (2005). Universities and the Europe of Knowledge: Ideas, Institutions, and Policy Entrepreneurship in European Union Higher Education Policy, 1955-2005. Palgrave Macmillan. https://books.google.com.ua/books/about/Universities_and_the_Europe_of_Knowledge.html?id=lmSHDAAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y, [in English].

Council of the European Union. (2006). Recommendation of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 on key competences for lifelong learning. Official Journal of the European Union, L 394, 10–18. CELEX. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32006H0962, [in English].

Council of the European Union. (2018). Council recommendation of 22 May 2018 on key competences for lifelong learning (Text with EEA relevance). Official Journal of the European Union, С 189, 1–13. CELEX. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32018H0604(01), [in English].

Council of the European Union. (2021). Council Resolution on a strategic framework for European cooperation in education and training towards the European Education Area and beyond (2021-2030) 2021/C 66/01. Official Journal of the European Union, C 66, 1–21. CELEX. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32021G0226(01), [in English].

European Commission. (2008). A Rewarding Challenge: How Language diversity Could Strengthen Europe (Proposals from the Group of Intellectuals for Intercultural Dialogue). European Commission. https://www.språkförsvaret.se/sf/fileadmin/PDF/Rewarding_challenge.pdf, [in English].

European Commission. (2020). Communication from the commission to the European parliament, the council, the European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions. Digital Education Action Plan 2021-2027. Resetting education and training for the digital age. European Commission. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52020DC0624, [in English].

European Commission. (2022). Communication from the commission to the European parliament, the European council and the council. Commission Opinion on Ukraine’s application for membership of the European Union. European Commission. https://neighbourhood-enlargement.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2022-06/Ukraine%20Opinion%20and%20Annex.pdf, [in English].

European Commission. (2023a). Education and Training Monitor 2023: comparative report. Publications Office of the European Union. https://ec.europa.eu/education/monitor, [in English].

European Commission. (2023b). Education and Training Monitor Toolbox 2023. Publications Office of the European Union. https://op.europa.eu/webpub/eac/education-and-training-monitor-2023/en/monitor-toolbox/themes/teaching-profession/attractiveness-teaching-profession.html, [in English].

European Commission. (n. d.). European Education Area: Quality education and training for all. https://education.ec.europa.eu/about-eea/strategic-framework, [in English].

European Union. (n. d.). Erasmus+ Virtual Exchange. https://youth.europa.eu/erasmusvirtual_en, [in English].

Gaušas S., Daminov, I., Jašinskaitė, E., Čop, D., Mileiko, I., Gudauskaitė, G., Leaton Gray, S., Pukallus, S., & Bulwer J. (2022). The European Schools system: State of Play, Challenges and Perspectives. European Union. https://www.eursc.eu/Documents/EP%20PE699_647_European_Schools_System_study.pdf, [in English].

Huisman J., Adelman, C., Hsieh, C.C., Shams, F., & Wilkins, S. (2012). Europe’s Bologna process and its impact on global higher education. In D. K. Deardorff, H. de Wit, J. D. Heyl, and T. Adams (eds.) The SAGE Handbook of International Higher Education (p. 81-100). Sage Publications. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452218397, [in English].

Kabinet Ministriv Ukrainy (KMU). (2016, 14 December). Kontseptsiia realizatsii derzhavnoi polityky u sferi reformuvannia zahalnoi serednoi osvity «Nova ukrainska shkola» na period do 2029 roku: Rozporiadzhennia № 988-r. [Concept for the implementation of state policy in the field of reforming general secondary education «New Ukrainian School» for the period up to 2029: Order No. 988-p.]. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/988-2016-%D1%80#Text, [in Ukrainian].

Kondratiuk, V. V. (2007). Intehratsiini protsesy: poniattia, pidkhody, zakordonnyi dosvid [Integration processes: concepts, approaches, foreign experience]. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats KNTU. Ekonomichni nauky [Collection of scientific works of KNTU. Economic sciences], 4, 215–219. https://dspace.kntu.kr.ua/server/api/core/bitstreams/4cd655ef-8023-47b8-894d-3d2f34564c0e/content, [in Ukrainian].

Kovács, T., Bittner, B., & Nabradi, A. (2022). The Integration of Digital Technologies in the European Union based on the DESI Index. ENTRENOVA – ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion, 8(1), 337–349. http://dx.doi.org/10.54820/entrenova-2022-0029, [in English].

Lawn, M., & Grek, S. (2012). Europeanizing Education: Governing a New Policy Space. Symposium Books. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED530747, [in English].

Lokshyna, O. (2024a). Yevropeiskyi osvitnii prostir yak intehratsiina perspektyva ukrainskoi osvity [European Educational Area as an Integration Prospect for Ukrainian Education]. Ukrainskyi Pedahohichnyi zhurnal [Ukrainian Pedagogical Journal], 2, 6–19. https://doi.org/10.32405/2411-1317-2024-2-6-19, [in Ukrainian].

Lokshyna, O. I. (2024b). Aktualnist naukovykh doslidzhen ukrainskykh komparatyvistiv v umovakh yevropeiskoi intehratsii natsionalnoi osvity [Relevance of Scientific Research of Ukrainian Comparativists in the Context of European Integration of National Education]. In Tsyfrova kompetentnist vchytelia novoi ukrainskoi shkoly 2024: innovatsii v umovakh zmin: preprynt [Digital competence of the teacher of the new Ukrainian school 2024: innovations in the face of change: preprint] (s. 72–73). ITsO NAPN Ukrainy. https://lib.iitta.gov.ua/id/eprint/741127, [in Ukrainian].

Lokshyna, O. I. (ed.), Dzhurylo, A. P., Hlushko, O. Z., Kravchenko, C. M., Nikolska, N. V., Tymenko, M. M., & Shparyk, O. M. (2021). Tendentsii rozvytku shkilnoi osvity v krainakh YeS, SShA ta Kytai [Trends in the development of school education in the EU, the USA and China]: monohrafiia. KONVI PRINT. https://doi.org/10.32405/978-617-8124-17-5-2021-350, [in Ukrainian].

Lokshyna, O. I., Dzhurylo, A. P., Glushko, O. Z., & Shparyk, O. M. (2021). Secondary education reform priorities under globalisation: the case of Ukraine in comparison with China, Germany and Poland. SHS Web of Conferences, 104, 01004. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202110401004, [in English].

Ministerstvo osvity i nauky Ukrainy (MON Ukrainy). (2016, 27 October). Nova ukrainska shkola. Kontseptualni zasady reformuvannia serednoi shkoly [New Ukrainian school. Conceptual framework for secondary school reform]. https://mon.gov.ua/static-objects/mon/sites/1/zagalna%20serednya/nova-ukrainska-shkola-compressed.pdf, [in Ukrainian].

OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Results (Volume II): Where All Students Can Succeed. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/b5fd1b8f-en, [in English].

OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 results: Factsheets. Ukrainian regions (18 of 27). OECD. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2023/11/pisa-2022-results-volume-i-and-ii-country-notes_2fca04b9/ukrainian-regions-18-of-27_de3ad3b1/78043794-en.pdf, [in English].

Phillips, D., & Ertl, H. (eds.). (2003). Implementing European Union education and training policy: A comparative study of issues in four member states. Kluwer Academic Publishers. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48077-8, [in English].

Prpic, M. (2014). The Open Method of Coordination. European Parliament Research Service. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/EPRS/EPRS-AaG-542142-Open-Method-of-Coordination-FINAL.pdf, [in English].

Radkevych, V. O. (ed.), Popova, V. V., Dzhurylo, A. P., & Voronina-Pryhodii, D. A. (2023). Zarubizhnyi dosvid rozvytku publichno-pryvatnoho partnerstva u sferi profesiinoi osvity i navchannia: praktychnyi posibnyk [Foreign experience in developing public-private partnership in the field of vocational education and training: a practical manual]. Instytut profesiinoi osvity NAPN Ukrainy. https://lib.iitta.gov.ua/id/eprint/739931, [in Ukrainian].

Sbruieva, A. A. (2021). Porivnialna pedahohika vyshchoi shkoly: natsionalnyi, yevropeiskyi ta hlobalnyi konteksty: navchalnyi posibnyk [Comparative Pedagogy of Higher Education: National, European and Global Contexts: A Study Guide]. SumDPU imeni A. S. Makarenka. https://jmm.sspu.edu.ua/images/2021/kursi_vse/CompHEd_course/Comparative_Higher_Education_Handbook_2021n_49126.pdf, [in Ukrainian].

Shaw, J. (2022). European Integration. A. Introduction: Integration Through Law. The Oxford Encylopedia of EU Law [OEEUL]. https://opil.ouplaw.com/display/10.1093/law-oeeul/law-oeeul-e102, [in English].

Shparyk, О. (2024). Intehratsiia shkilnykh system u Yevropeiskomu Soiuzi: suchasni tendentsii. [Integration of educational school systems within the European Union: current trends]. Ukrainskyi Pedahohichnyi zhurnal [Ukrainian Pedagogical Journal], 3, 41–51. https://doi.org/10.32405/2411-1317-2024-3-41-51, [in Ukrainian].

St. John, S. K. (2020). Education and Solidarity in the European Union: Europe’s Lost Spirit. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63042-3, [in English].

Steinberg, F. (2023). The Next Steps in EU Economic Integration. Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS). https://www.csis.org/analysis/next-steps-eu-economic-integration, [in English].

Sysoieva, S. (2014). Porivnialna pedahohika v konteksti rozvytku osvitolohii [Comparative Pedagogy in the Context of Educational Development]. Osvitolohiia [Education Studies], 3, 17-23. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/ocvit_2014_3_4, [in Ukrainian].

Topuzov, O., Lokshyna, O., Dzhurylo, A., & Shparyk, O. (2023). Yevropeiskyi doslidnytskyi prostir yak oriientyr rozvytku osvity i nauky v Ukraini [The European Research Area as a benchmark for the development of education and science in Ukraine]. Ukrainskyi Pedahohichnyi zhurnal [Ukrainian Pedagogical Journal], 4, 5–19. https://doi.org/10.32405/2411-1317-2023-4-5-19, [in Ukrainian].

Ultan Sönmez, M. O. (2016). The effect of cultural factors on the European integration. In IISES – 23rd International Academic Conference (p. 442–456), Venice. http://dx.doi.org/10.20472/IAC.2016.023.091, [in English].

Vaubel, R. (2004). European Political Integration. In Rowley, C. K., Schneider, F. (eds.) The Encyclopedia of Public Choice (p. 554-556). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-306-47828-4_97, [in English].

Zakon Ukrainy «Pro osvitu». (2017). Zakon Ukrainy [Law of Ukraine «On Education»] № 2145-VIII. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2145-19#Text, [in Ukrainian].

Ziegele, F., & Mordhorst, L. (2019). Competition, Collaboration and Complementarity: Higher Education Policies in Europe. In R. M. O. Pritchard, M. O’Hara, C. Milsom, J. Williams, L. Matei (eds.) The Three Cs of Higher Education: Competition, Collaboration and Complementarity (p. 11–26). Central European University Press. https://dokumen.pub/the-three-cs-of-higher-education-competition-collaboration-and-complementarity-9789633863282.html, [in English].

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.