THE IMPACT OF A GENERAL SECONDARY EDUCATION INSTITUTION PRINCIPALS’ ASSESSMENT OF ATTESTATION EFFECTIVENESS ON THEIR SUBSEQUENT PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES
PDF (Українська)

Keywords

professional performance
assessment
attestation
effectiveness
influence
school principal (head) of a general secondary education institution
distinction

How to Cite

Lukina, T. (2025). THE IMPACT OF A GENERAL SECONDARY EDUCATION INSTITUTION PRINCIPALS’ ASSESSMENT OF ATTESTATION EFFECTIVENESS ON THEIR SUBSEQUENT PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES. Ukrainian Educational Journal, (4), 150–164. https://doi.org/10.32405/2411-1317-2025-4-150-164

Abstract

This study aims to explore the opinions of general secondary education institution principals regarding the impact of their professional performance assessment (certification) results on subsequent changes within their educational institutions. A questionnaire specially developed by the author and distributed via Google Forms was used for the survey. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient indicates high reliability of the questionnaire as a measurement instrument (α>0.9). The study was based on a comparative analysis of responses from two groups of school principals, who expressed diametrically opposed opinions (“absolutely ineffective” – 135 respondents; “very effective” – 430 respondents) regarding the effectiveness (usefulness for future work) of the current certification procedure for their positions as heads of educational institutions. The results allowed us to rank a specific list of the most characteristic actions related to three main clusters (“Educational Policy and Management of School Development,” “Professionalism,” and “Environment of Interaction”), as well as to determine the principals’ views on a list of the most important performance indicators for these clusters. Mathematical statistics methods confirmed the presence of statistically significant differences in the subsequent behavior of school principals depending on their assessment of the effectiveness of their certification.
The study was conducted as part of the research project “Assessment of the Professional Activity of Teaching Staff.” The author based his reasoning on the idea that a positive perception by a teaching staff member, particularly the director of a general secondary education institution, of the results of a professional performance assessment will motivate them to focus their efforts on further professional development and create the necessary conditions for the ongoing success of all students at the institution.

https://doi.org/10.32405/2411-1317-2025-4-150-164
PDF (Українська)

References

Лукіна, Т. (2025а). Концептуальні засади організаційної моделі оцінювання професійної діяльності директора закладу загальної середньої освіти: за матеріалами опитування. Український педагогічний журнал, (2), 65–80. https://doi.org/10.32405/2411-1317-2025-2-65-80

Лукіна, Т. (2025b). Професійна діяльність директора закладу загальної середньої освіти та оцінювання її ефективності: аналітичні матеріали за результатами пілотного регіонального онлайн опитування. Педагогічна думка. https://doi.org/10.32405/978-966-644-783-1-2025-60

Лукіна, Т.О. (2007). Моніторинг якості освіти як інформаційна основа управління освітою в Україні. У Н.М. Бібік (Ред.), Педагогічна і психологічна науки в Україні: Т. 2. Дидактика, методика, інформаційні технології (с. 134–144). Київ: Пед. думка. https://lib.iitta.gov.ua/id/eprint/4131

Лукіна, Т.О. (2022). Проблеми трансформації професійного розвитку керівників освіти у поствоєнний період в контексті національної безпеки України. У Публічне управління та адміністрування в умовах війни і в поствоєнний період в Україні (с. 137–140). ДЗВО «УМО» НАПН України. https://ispp.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/tezy0422-t2.pdf#page=137

Brinia, V., Katsionis, C., Gkouma, A., & Vrekousis., I. (2023). Attitudes and Perceptions of School Principals about the Contribution of Evaluation to the Efficient Operation of Schools Both at the Administrative and Educational Levels. Education Sciences, 13(4), 366. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040366

Burkett, J. (2020). Ineffective campus leadership: Why teachers leave bad principals. Journal of Academic Perspectives, (4). https://www.journalofacademicperspectives.com/back-issues/volume-2020/volume-2020-no-4/

Burkett, J. (2023). Evaluating Principal Effectiveness: A Review of the Literature, Journal of Educational Leadership in Action, 9 (1), art. 2. https://doi.org/10.62608/2164-1102.1127

Clifford, M., & Ross, S. (2012). Rethinking principal evaluation: A new paradigm informed by research and practice. National Association of Elementary School Principals, National Association of Secondary School Principals.

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd Ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

Cronbach, L. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16 (3), 297–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02310555

Fuller, E. J., & Hollingworth, L. (2014). A bridge too far? Challenges in evaluating principal effectiveness. Educational Administration Quarterly, (50), 466–499. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X13506595

Fuller, E. J., Hollingworth, L., & Liu, J. (2015). Evaluating state principal evaluation plans across the United States. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 10 (3), 164–192. https://doi-org.ezp.twu.edu/10.1177/1942775115614291

Goff, P., Salisbury, J., & Blitz, M. (2015). Comparing CALL and VAL‐ED: An Illustrative Application of a Decision Matrix for Selecting Among Leadership Feedback Instruments. WCER Working Paper, (2015‐5). https://wcer.wisc.edu/publications/abstract/wcer-working-paper-no.-2015-05

Goldring, E. B., Mavrogordato, M., & Haynes, K. T. (2015). Multisource principal evaluation data: Principals’ orientations and reactions to teacher feedback regarding their leadership effectiveness. Educational Administration Quarterly, 51(4), 572–599. https://doi.org/10.1086/598841

Grissom, J. A., Blissett, R. S. L., & Mitani, H. (2018). Evaluating School Principals: Supervisor Ratings of Principal Practice and Principal Job Performance. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 40 (3), 446–472. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373718783883

Harlina, S., Harapan, E., & Tahrun, J. (2021). The influence of principal leadership style and work ethic a towards teacher professionalism. Journal Pendidikan Tambusai, 5(1), 2354–2357. https://doi.org/10.31004/jptam.v5i1.1683.

Maya, İ., & Kaçar, Y. (2018). School Principals’ and Teachers’ Views on Teacher Performance Evaluation. International Journal of Progressive Education, 14(5), 77–88. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2018.157.7

Molapo, T., Parson, L., Hunter, Ch., & Butz, J. (2016) Changes in Principal Evaluation Standards: A Case Study of North Dakota Principals. School Leadership Review, 11 (1), art. 5. https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/slr/vol11/iss1/5

Nielsen, J. (2018). The Principal Evaluation: Connecting Principals’ Evaluation to the Growth and Development Process: A Case Study. Educational Administration: Theses, Dissertations, and Student Research, (288). https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cehsedaddiss/288

Paufler, N.A., & Sloat, E. F. (2020). Using standards to evaluate accountability policy in context: School administrator and teacher perceptions of a teacher evaluation system. Studies in Educational Evaluation, (64), 100806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.07.007

Player, D. (2018). Measuring Principal Effectiveness. EdPolicyWorks. University of Virginia.

Raj, C., Friedman J.N., & Rockoff, J.E. (2014). Measuring the Impacts of Teachers II: Teacher Value-Added and Student Outcomes in Adulthood. American Economic Review, 104(9), 2633–2679. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.9.2633

Sahlin, S. (2023). Professional development of school principals – how do experienced school leaders make sense of their professional learning? Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 53(2), 380–397. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432231168235

Superville, D.S. (2014, May 20). States forge ahead on principal evaluation. Education Week. http://www. edweek.org/ew/articles/2014/05/21/32principals_ep.h33.html

Swisher, A., & Saenz-Armstrong, P. (2022). State of the States 2022: Teacher and Principal Evaluation Policies. Washington, D.C.: National Council on Teacher Quality. https://www.nctq.org/publications/State-of-the-States-2022:-Teacher-and-Principal-Evaluation-Policies

Zedan, R. (2019). Attitudes of Teachers towards Principal’s Evaluations and Its Effects on Their Teaching Performances. Journal of Education and Culture Studies, 3 (3), 206-226. https://doi.org/10.22158/jecs.v3n3p206

Brinia, V., Katsionis, C., Gkouma, A., Vrekousis., I. (2023). Attitudes and Perceptions of School Principals about the Contribution of Evaluation to the Efficient Operation of Schools Both at the Administrative and Educational Levels. Education Sciences, 13(4), 366. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040366 (in English).

Burkett, J. (2020). Ineffective campus leadership: Why teachers leave bad principals. Journal of Academic Perspectives, (4). https://www.journalofacademicperspectives.com/back-issues/volume-2020/volume-2020-no-4/ (in English).

Burkett, J. (2023). Evaluating Principal Effectiveness: A Review of the Literature, Journal of Educational Leadership in Action, 9(1), art. 2. https://doi.org/10.62608/2164-1102.1127 (in English).

Clifford, M., & Ross, S. (2012). Rethinking principal evaluation: A new paradigm informed by research and practice. National Association of Elementary School Principals, National Association of Secondary School Principals (in English).

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd Ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers (in English).

Cronbach, L. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02310555 (in English).

Fuller, E. J., & Hollingworth, L. (2014). A bridge too far? Challenges in evaluating principal effectiveness. Educational Administration Quarterly, (50), 466–499. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X13506595 (in English).

Fuller, E.J., Hollingworth, L., & Liu, J. (2015). Evaluating state principal evaluation plans across the United States. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 10(3), 164–192. https://doi-org.ezp.twu.edu/10.1177/1942775115614291 (in English).

Goff, P., Salisbury, J., & Blitz, M. (2015). Comparing CALL and VAL‐ED: An Illustrative Application of a Decision Matrix for Selecting Among Leadership Feedback Instruments. WCER Working Paper, (2015‐5). https://wcer.wisc.edu/publications/abstract/wcer-working-paper-no.-2015-05 (in English).

Goldring, E. B., Mavrogordato, M., & Haynes, K. T. (2015). Multisource principal evaluation data: Principals orientations and reactions to teacher feedback regarding their leadership effectiveness. Educational Administration Quarterly, 51(4), 572-599. https://doi.org/10.1086/598841 (in English).

Grissom, J. A., Blissett, R. S. L., & Mitani, H. (2018). Evaluating School Principals: Supervisor Ratings of Principal Practice and Principal Job Performance. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 40(3), 446–472. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373718783883 (in English).

Harlina, S., Harapan, E., & Tahrun, J. (2021). The influence of principal leadership style and work ethic a towards teacher professionalism. Journal Pendidikan Tambusai, 5(1), 2354–2357. https://doi.org/10.31004/jptam.v5i1.1683 (in English).

Lukina, T. (2025a). Kontseptualni zasady orhanizatsiinoi modeli otsiniuvannia profesiinoi diialnosti dyrektora zakladu zahalnoi serednoi osvity: za materialamy opytuvannia. Ukrainskyi pedahohichnyi zhurnal, (2), 65–80. https://doi.org/10.32405/2411-1317-2025-2-65-80 (in Ukrainian).

Lukina, T. (2025b). Profesiina diialnist dyrektora zakladu zahalnoi serednoi osvity ta otsiniuvannia yii efektyvnosti: analitychni materialy za rezultatamy pilotnoho rehionalnoho onlain opytuvannia. Pedahohichna dumka. https://doi.org/10.32405/978-966-644-783-1-2025-60 (in Ukrainian).

Lukina, T.O. (2007). Monitorynh yakosti osvity yak informatsiina osnova upravlinnia osvitoiu v Ukraini. In Bibik, N.M. (Ed.), Pedahohichna i psykholohichna nauky v Ukraini, vol. 2: Dydaktyka, metodyka, informatsiini tekhnolohii (pp. 134–144). Kyiv: Pedfhohichna dumka. https://lib.iitta.gov.ua/id/eprint/4131 (in Ukrainian).

Lukina, T.O. (2022). Problemy transformatsii profesiinoho rozvytku kerivnykiv osvity u postvoiennyi period v konteksti natsionalnoi bezpeky Ukrainy. In Publichne upravlinnia ta administruvannia v umovakh viiny i v postvoiennyi period v Ukraini (pp. 137–140). DZVO «UMO» NAPN Ukrainy. https://ispp.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/tezy0422-t2.pdf#page=137 (in Ukrainian).

Maya, İ., & Kaçar, Y. (2018). School Principals and Teachers Views on Teacher Performance Evaluation. International Journal of Progressive Education, 14 (5), 77-88. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2018.157.7 (in English).

Molapo, T., Parson, L., Hunter, Ch., & Butz, J. (2016) Changes in Principal Evaluation Standards: A Case Study of North Dakota Principals. School Leadership Review, 11 (1), 5. https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/slr/vol11/iss1/5 (in English).

Nielsen, J. (2018). The Principal Evaluation: Connecting Principals Evaluation to the Growth and Development Process: A Case Study. Educational Administration: Theses, Dissertations, and Student Research, (288). https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cehsedaddiss/288 (in English).

Paufler, N.A., & Sloat, E. F. (2020). Using standards to evaluate accountability policy in context: School administrator and teacher perceptions of a teacher evaluation system. Studies in Educational Evaluation, (64), 100806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.07.007 (in English).

Player, D. (2018). Measuring Principal Effectiveness. EdPolicyWorks. University of Virginia (in English).

Raj, C., Friedman J.N., & Rockoff, J.E. (2014). Measuring the Impacts of Teachers II: Teacher Value-Added and Student Outcomes in Adulthood. American Economic Review, 104(9), 2633–2679. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.9.2633

Sahlin, S. (2023). Professional development of school principals – how do experienced school leaders make sense of their professional learning? Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 53(2), 380–397. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432231168235 (in English).

Superville, D.S. (2014, May 20). States forge ahead on principal evaluation. Education Week. http://www. edweek.org/ew/articles/2014/05/21/32principals_ep.h33.html (in English).

Swisher, A., & Saenz-Armstrong, P. (2022). State of the States 2022: Teacher and Principal Evaluation Policies. Washington, D.C.: National Council on Teacher Quality. https://www.nctq.org/publications/State-ofthe-States-2022:-Teacher-and-Principal-Evaluation-Policies (in English).

Zedan, R. (2019). Attitudes of Teachers towards Principals Evaluations and Its Effects on Their Teaching Performances. Journal of Education and Culture Studies, 3(3), 206–226. https://doi.org/10.22158/jecs.v3n3p206 (in English).

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.