Abstract
Reading plays a pivotal role in the process of foreign language learning. It not only fosters acquisition of linguistic material but also contributes to the development of comprehensive foreign-language communicative competence. Despite its seemingly “passive” nature, reading calls for active mental involvement, combining processes such as recognizing linguistic units, predicting,
interpreting, and evaluating information. It serves as an effective tool for assimilation of grammar and vocabulary, expands lexical resources, builds skills for working with various types of discourse, and promotes integration of all forms of linguistic activity. Reading also has a powerful motivational potential: it stimulates cognitive engagement, develops critical thinking and independent work skills, as well as contributes to shaping intercultural competence.
Modern research, particularly the results of PISA monitoring conducted by the OECD, indicates a decline in reading literacy levels, largely due to the influence of the digital environment and the displacement of written texts by visual and multimedia formats. This underscores the need for specialized training in reading strategies to help students navigate texts of different genres and complexity levels. Such strategies include skimming, scanning, intensive and critical reading. Nevertheless, author insists that prior to shaping each of these strategies a key tool in shaping skills of thoughtful reading should be “reciprocal teaching”, a technique based on four core skills: predicting, questioning, clarifying, and summarizing. Its use enhances metacognitive strategies, develops the ability to analyze and structure information, and fosters social interaction skills through structured educational dialogue.
Author emphasizes that effectiveness of shaping reading competence depends on the students’ level of so-called “vocabulary readiness”. An insufficient vocabulary can hinder the application of strategies and lower motivation, whereas targeted work with texts of various genres ensures a gradual increase in linguistic resources.
Overall, reading activity serves not only as a means of acquiring linguistic knowledge but also as a gateway to developing general educational and intercultural competences essential for successful integration into the modern information space.
References
Кулеба Д. (2019). Війна за реальність: як перемагати у світі фейків, правд і спільнот. Київ: Книголав.
Міністерство освіти і науки України. (2020–2023). PISA-2018: Україна в центрі уваги.
Міністерство освіти і науки України. (2021). Модельна навчальна програма «Іноземна мова. 5-9 класи» для закладів загальної середньої освіти.
Міністерство освіти і науки України. (2022). Національний звіт за результатами міжнародного дослідження якості освіти PISA-2022.
Пасічник, О. С. (2023). Переосмислення вікових психологічних особливостей учнів 7-9 класів та їх вплив на оволодіння іноземною мовою. Український педагогічний журнал, 4, 115–130. https://doi.org/10.32405/2411-1317-2023-4-115-130
Редько, В. Г. (2017). Конструювання змісту шкільних підручників з іноземних мов: теорія і практика: монографія. Київ: Педагогічна думка.
Редько, В. Г., Полонська, Т. К., Пасічник, О. С. та ін. (2022). Методика компетентнісно орієнтованого навчання іноземних мов учнів 5–6 класів гімназій: методичний посібник. Київ: Педагогічна думка.
Council of Europe. (2020). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Companion Volume with New Descriptors. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.
English G Access Band 2 (2014). Cornelsen (53).
English G Access Band 4. (2016). Cornelsen (48).
Foster C. (2025). Screen time rewires your child’s brain – here’s what you can do about it. The Independent. https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/screen-time-children-effectsbrain-b2748737.html
Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. L. (2002). Teaching and Researching Reading. Pearson Education
Köroğlu, M., & Balci, A. (2022). Strategies used by Turkish teachers in teaching comprehension (reading) in Turkish lesson teaching process. International Journal of Progressive Education, 18 (5), 18-31. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2022.485.2
Krashen, S. (1989). The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implications. Longman
Krashen, S. (1989). We Acquire Vocabulary and Spelling by Reading: Additional Evidence for the Input Hypothesis. The Modern Language Journal, 73(4), 440-464. https://doi.org/10.2307/326879
Lindholm, A. (2019). Flerspråkiga elevers läsförståelse på svenska: Om lässtrategier och läsutveckling på mellanstadiet [Multilingual students’ reading comprehension in Swedish: On reading strategies and reading development in middle school]. University of Gothenburg, Department of Education and Special Education. Retrieved from https://gupea.ub.gu.se/bitstream/handle/2077/60056/gupea_2077_60056_3.pdf
Nation, I. S. P. (2009). Teaching ESL/EFL Reading and Writing. Routledge, Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203891643
Nguyen, T. Q. (2023). Impact of processing various textual genres on the incidental acquisition and retention of L2 vocabulary. English Teaching, 78(2), 139-164. https://doi.org/10.15858/engtea.78.2.202306.139
Oakhill, J. V., Cain, K., & Bryant, P. E. (2003). The dissociation of word reading and text comprehension: Evidence from component skills. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18(4), 443–468. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960344000008
Okkinga, M., van Gelderen, A. J. S., van Schooten, E., van Steensel, R., & Sleegers, P. J. C. (2023). Does vocabulary knowledge matter in the effectiveness of instructing reading strategies? Differential responses from adolescents with low academic achievement on growth in reading comprehension. Reading and Writing, 36(10), 2549-2575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-023-10452-5
Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1(2), 117–175. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0102_1
Pomeroy, G. (2025). Denmark scraps book tax to fight ‘reading crisis’. Retrieved from https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/crm48mvl33ro
Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667305
Stevens, E. A., Park, S., & Vaughn, S. (2019). A review of summarizing and main idea interventions for struggling readers in grades 3 through 12: 1978–2016. Remedial and Special Education, 40(3), 131-149. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932517749940
Council of Europe. (2020). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Companion Volume with New Descriptors. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing (in English).
English G Access Band 2 (2014). Cornelsen (53) (in English).
English G Access Band 4. (2016). Cornelsen (48) (in English).
Foster C. (2025). Screen time rewires your child’s brain – here’s what you can do about it. The Independent. https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/screen-time-children-effectsbrain-b2748737.html (in English).
Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. L. (2002). Teaching and Researching Reading. Pearson Education (in English).
Köroğlu, M., & Balci, A. (2022). Strategies used by Turkish teachers in teaching comprehension (reading) in Turkish lesson teaching process. International Journal of Progressive Education, 18 (5), 18-31. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2022.485.2 (in English).
Krashen, S. (1989). The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implications. Longman (in English).
Krashen, S. (1989). We Acquire Vocabulary and Spelling by Reading: Additional Evidence for the Input Hypothesis. The Modern Language Journal, 73(4), 440-464. https://doi.org/10.2307/326879 (in English).
Kuleba D. (2019). Viina za realnist: yak peremahaty u sviti feikiv, pravd i spilnot. Kyiv: Knyholav (in Ukrainian).
Lindholm, A. (2019). Flerspråkiga elevers läsförståelse på svenska: Om lässtrategier och läsutveckling på mellanstadiet [Multilingual students’ reading comprehension in Swedish: On reading strategies and reading development in middle school]. University of Gothenburg, Department of Education and Special Education. https://gupea.ub.gu.se/bitstream/handle/2077/60056/gupea_2077_60056_3.pdf (in English).
Ministerstvo osvity i nauky Ukrainy. (2020–2023). PISA-2018: Ukraina v tsentri uvagy (in Ukrainian).
Ministerstvo osvity i nauky Ukrainy. (2021). Modelna navchalna prohrama «Inozemna mova. 5–9 klasy» dlia zakladiv zahalnoi serednoi osvity (in Ukrainian).
Ministerstvo osvity i nauky Ukrainy. (2022). Natsionalnyi zvit za rezultatamy mizhnarodnoho doslidzhennia yakosti osvity PISA-2022 (in Ukrainian).
Nation, I. S. P. (2009). Teaching ESL/EFL Reading and Writing. Routledge, Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203891643
Nguyen, T. Q. (2023). Impact of processing various textual genres on the incidental acquisition and retention of L2 vocabulary. English Teaching, 78(2), 139-164. https://doi.org/10.15858/engtea.78.2.202306.139 (in English).
Oakhill, J. V., Cain, K., & Bryant, P. E. (2003). The dissociation of word reading and text comprehension: Evidence from component skills. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18(4), 443–468. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960344000008 (in English)
Okkinga, M., van Gelderen, A. J. S., van Schooten, E., van Steensel, R., & Sleegers, P. J. C. (2023). Does vocabulary knowledge matter in the effectiveness of instructing reading strategies? Differential responses from adolescents with low academic achievement on growth in reading comprehension. Reading and Writing, 36 (10), 2549-2575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-023-10452-5 (in English).
Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1(2), 117–175. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0102_1 (in English).
Pasichnyk O. S. (2023). Pereosmyslennia vikovykh psykholohichnykh osoblyvostei uchniv 7–9 klasiv ta yikh vplyv na ovolodinnia inozemnoiu movoiu. Ukrainskyi pedahohichnyi zhurnal, 4, 115–130. https://doi.org/10.32405/2411-1317-2023-4-115-130 (in Ukrainian).
Redko V. H. (2017). Konstruiuvannia zmistu shkilnykh pidruchnykiv z inozemnykh mov: teoriia i praktyka: monohrafiia. Kyiv: Pedahohichna dumka (in Ukrainian).
Redko V. H., Polonska T. K., Pasichnyk O. S. et al. (2022). Metodyka kompetentnisno oriientovanoho navchannia inozemnykh mov uchniv 5–6 klasiv himnazii: metodychnyi posibnyk. Kyiv: Pedahohichna dumka (in Ukrainian).
Pomeroy, G. (2025). Denmark scraps book tax to fight ‘reading crisis’. Retrieved from https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/crm48mvl33ro (in English).
Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667305 (in English).
Stevens, E. A., Park, S., & Vaughn, S. (2019). A review of summarizing and main idea interventions for struggling readers in grades 3 through 12: 1978–2016. Remedial and Special Education, 40 (3), 131-149. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932517749940 (in English).

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

