Abstract
The article addresses the development of analytical competence among future officers of the Naval Forces of Ukraine, in the context of the transformation of the military education system and the growing requirements for the professional training of military specialists. The purpose of the article is to substantiate the structure of analytical competence of future Naval officers of Ukraine and to analyze its components and indicators of formation.
The study employs a set of theoretical research methods, including analysis and generalization of scientific sources, comparative analysis of national and international approaches to the interpretation of competence, conceptual and categorical analysis, systematization, and modeling.
The article examines the main approaches to understanding competence (functional, contextual, resource-mobilization, responsibility-and-autonomy-based, and integrative-systemic). It substantiates the relevance of their integration into the military educational context. Based on the generalization of contemporary pedagogical models, four core components of competence are identified: knowledge, skills and abilities, attitudes, and experience. These components align with the international KSA (Knowledge–Skills–Attitudes) model and the provisions of the National Qualifications Framework of Ukraine.
A structural-component model of analytical competence of future Naval officers is proposed, encompassing cognitive, activity-based, emotional-reflexive, and practical-instrumental components. The mental component ensures mastery of the theoretical foundations of logic, critical thinking, systems analysis, and information processing methods. The activity-based component reflects the ability to apply analytical operations in decision-making processes, conduct information search and selection, visualize data, and present analytical findings in a reasoned manner. The emotional-reflexive component includes a commitment to objectivity, cognitive flexibility, and the ability to engage in self-reflection and revise one’s judgments. The practical-instrumental component is associated with experience in applying analytical approaches in professional activity, risk assessment, and managerial decision-making in a dynamic environment.
For each component, content elements, as well as behavioral and outcome indicators of formation, are defined, enabling the operationalization of the concept of analytical competence and laying the foundation for developing diagnostic tools and methodological support for its formation. It is substantiated that analytical competence functions as a system-forming factor in the professional readiness of future Naval officers, integrating the intellectual, personal, and practical dimensions of professional activity.
References
Бакуменко, Р. О. (2020) Складники інформаційно-аналітичної компетентності офіцерів оперативно-тактичної ланки управління. Педагогіка формування творчої особистості у вищій і загальноосвітній школах, 69 (1), 51-55. https://doi.org/10.32840/1992-5786.2020.69-1.9
Задорожний, Д. (2023). Проєктно-аналітична діяльність майбутніх офіцерів як проблема наук про освіту. Педагогічні науки, (82), 57–61. https://doi.org/10.33989/2524-2474.2023.82.295098
Зелений, І. І., & Боярська-Хоменко, А. В. (2024). Професійний саморозвиток офіцерів розвідки у контексті реалізації принципу освіти впродовж військової кар’єри. Освіта дорослих: теорія, досвід, перспективи, 1 (25), 86-97. https://doi.org/10.35387/od.1(25).2024.86-97
Марченков, С. (2019b). Наукові аспекти формування інформаційно-аналітичної компетентності в майбутніх офіцерів. Освітні обрії, 1 (48), 57-60. https://doi.org/10.15330/obrii.48.1.57-60
Марченков, С. М. (2019а). Формування інформаційно-аналітичної компетентності майбутніх офіцерів Збройних Сил України: науково-педагогічний аспект. Проблеми створення, випробування, застосування та експлуатації складних інформаційних систем, (17), 89–97. https://doi.org/10.46972/2076-1546.2019.17.08
Міністерство оборони України. (2024). Положення про особливості організації освітнього процесу у вищих військових навчальних закладах Міністерства оборони України, військових навчальних підрозділах закладів вищої освіти, закладах фахової передвищої військової освіти (Наказ № 120). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0453-24/ed20240215#n22
Національна рамка кваліфікацій. Загальна частина. (2021). https://mon.gov.ua/static-objects/mon/sites/1/nrk/2021/11.10/Zvit.pro.samosertyfikatsiyu.NRK-dodatok.1-10.11.pdf
Keevy, J., Chakroun, B. (2015). Level-setting and recognition of learning outcomes: the use of level descriptors in the twenty-first century. Paris: UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.54675/GKWN6283
Paterson, A., McDonald, Z., Mekonnen, A., Mugo, H., Vally, Z., Xaba, N., & Keevy, J. (2022). Skills recognition mechanisms for selected occupational profiles of migrant workers in Ethiopia, Kenya and South Africa: feasibility study. Geneva: International Labour Organization.
Quality assurance policy of Education and Training of the Naval Institute of the National University «Odesa Maritime Academy». (2025). https://ivms.mil.gov.ua/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/ministry-of-defence-of-ukraine.pdf
Rosas, G., & Corbanese, V. (2006) Glossary of key terms for learning and training for work. International Training Centre of the ILO. Turin: ITC ILO.
Terminology of European education and training policy. (2026). https://www.cedefop.europa.eu/en/tools/vet-glossary/glossary
UIS Data Browser. Glossary. (2026). https://databrowser.uis.unesco.org/resources/glossary
Witthaus, G., Inamorato dos Santos, A., Childs, M., Tannhäuser, A., Conole, G., Nkuyubwatsi, B., & Punie, Y. (2016). Validation of non-formal MOOC-based learning: an analysis of assessment and recognition practices in Europe (OpenCred). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2791/809371.
Bakumenko, R. O. (2020) Skladnyky informatsiino-analitychnoi kompetentnosti ofitseriv operatyvno-taktychnoi lanky upravlinnia. Pedahohika formuvannia tvorchoi osobystosti u vyshchii i zahalnoosvitnii shkolakh, 69 (1), 51-55. https://doi.org/10.32840/1992-5786.2020.69-1.9 (in Ukrainian).
Keevy, J., Chakroun, B. (2015). Level-setting and recognition of learning outcomes: the use of level descriptors in the twenty-first century. Paris: UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.54675/GKWN6283 (in English).
Marchenkov, S. (2019b). Naukovi aspekty formuvannia informatsiino-analitychnoi kompetentnosti v maibutnikh ofitseriv. Osvitni obrii, 1 (48), 57-60. https://doi.org/10.15330/obrii.48.1.57-60 (in Ukrainian).
Marchenkov, S. M. (2019a). Formuvannia informatsiino-analitychnoi kompetentnosti maibutnikh ofitseriv Zbroinykh Syl Ukrainy: naukovo-pedahohichnyi aspekt. Problemy stvorennia, vyprobuvannia, zastosuvannia ta ekspluatatsii skladnykh informatsiinykh system, (17), 89–97. https://doi.org/10.46972/2076-1546.2019.17.08 (in Ukrainian).
Ministerstvo oborony Ukrainy. (2024). Polozhennia pro osoblyvosti orhanizatsii osvitnoho protsesu u vyshchykh viiskovykh navchalnykh zakladakh Ministerstva oborony Ukrainy, viiskovykh navchalnykh pidrozdilakh zakladiv vyshchoi osvity, zakladakh fakhovoi peredvyshchoi viiskovoi osvity (Nakaz No. 120). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0453-24/ed20240215#n22 (in Ukrainian).
Natsionalna ramka kvalifikatsii. Zahalna chastyna. (2021). https://mon.gov.ua/static-objects/mon/sites/1/nrk/2021/11.10/Zvit.pro.samosertyfikatsiyu.NRK-dodatok.1-10.11.pdf (in Ukrainian).
Paterson, A., McDonald, Z., Mekonnen, A., Mugo, H., Vally, Z., Xaba, N., & Keevy, J. (2022). Skills recognition mechanisms for selected occupational profiles of migrant workers in Ethiopia, Kenya and South Africa: feasibility study. Geneva: International Labour Organization (in Ukrainian).
Quality assurance policy of Education and Training of the Naval Institute of the National University «Odesa Maritime Academy». (2025). https://ivms.mil.gov.ua/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/ministry-of-defence-of-ukraine.pdf (in Ukrainian).
Rosas, G., Corbanese, V. (2006). Glossary of key terms for learning and training for work. International Training Centre of the ILO. Turin: ITC ILO.
Terminology of European education and training policy. (2026). https://www.cedefop.europa.eu/en/tools/vet-glossary/glossary (in Ukrainian).
UIS Data Browser. Glossary. (2026). https://databrowser.uis.unesco.org/resources/glossary (in Ukrainian).
Witthaus, G., Inamorato dos Santos, A., Childs, M., Tannhäuser, A., Conole, G., Nkuyubwatsi, B., & Punie, Y. (2016). Validation of non-formal MOOC-based learning: an analysis of assessment and recognition practices in Europe (OpenCred). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2791/809371 (in Ukrainian).
Zadorozhnyi, D. (2023). Proiektno-analitychna diialnist maibutnikh ofitseriv yak problema nauk pro osvitu. Pedahohichni nauky, (82), 57–61. https://doi.org/10.33989/2524-2474.2023.82.295098 (in Ukrainian).
Zelenyi, I. I., & Boiarska-Khomenko, A. V. (2024). Profesiinyi samorozvytok ofitseriv rozvidky u konteksti realizatsii pryntsypu osvity vprodovzh viiskovoi kariery. Osvita doroslykh: teoriia, dosvid, perspektyvy, 1 (25), 86-97. https://doi.org/10.35387/od.1(25).2024.86-97 (in Ukrainian).

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

